[Spits] [TR] spit suspension question

[Joe Curry]

Exactly!  So adding it all up, just weighs more heavily on the conclusion
that putting a swing spring on an early spit in opposition to a camber
compensator is not an economically sound decision.

Thanks for that observation.

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: spitfires-bounces+spitlist=cox.net at autox.team.net
[mailto:spitfires-bounces+spitlist=cox.net at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Jim
Muller
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:09 PM
To: spitfires at autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Spits] [TR] spit suspension question

On 9 Nov 2007 at 18:55, Joe Curry wrote:

> But the increase in the sway bar was an effort to compensate for
> the decrease in rear roll stiffness.

Which is exactly why I brought it up.  It is yet one more necessary 
thing that that fellow has to change if he wants to go to a swing-
spring.  BL did it for a reason and so must everyone else too.