[Spridgets] British Drivers are speaking out....

[Guy R Day]

Oh no, no, no, no.  This is without doubt a good profitable money making 
venture that has paid for itself many times over.  The cameras are being 
covered because the operating costs have to be covered by the Local 
Authority (Local Council) but the revenue gained has to go to Government.
Look for a change in revenue direction and the covers will be removed 
quicker than Frank can start a 948 on the garage floor.

If you want a rather late heads up on investment go for the camera systems 
with automatic number plate recognition that are uplinked to central 
computer systems.  They will track you, calculate your speed between the 
cameras, allow road use pricing and let big brother follow you and your car 
wherever it goes.  They work in the dark using infra-red at distances around 
1000 yards (tested in excess of 1 mile).  Because they work at that distance 
they can be at a low enough angle to look into the car for facial 
recognition software to work.  This allows for every paranoid's nightmare to 
come true.  They are also mounted too high to burn!!  US gun laws have some 
use after all! <smile>


Guy R Day



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brad Fornal" <tequila.brad at gmail.com>
To: <WeslakeMonza1330 at aol.com>
Cc: <spridgets at autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] British Drivers are speaking out....


> It's amazing how the will of the people, can make a money making venture,
> COST MORE MONEY THAN IT IS WORTH!!!
>
> LOL
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:26 PM, <WeslakeMonza1330 at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Nope, and they are now switching them off and putting covers on them.
>> Seems like it costs too much money to operate them.
>>
>> In a message dated 21/08/2010 20:43:58 GMT Daylight Time,
>> spritenut at comcast.net writes:
>>
>> And in  Nuneaton no less, Daniel, have you been trashing speed cameras? 
>> ;)
>> _______________________________________________