[Tigers] transmissions
Steve Laifman
SLaifman at SoCal.rr.com
Sun Jan 27 13:28:10 MST 2008
Russ,
I agree with John Logan. I have the "wide" (not) ratio transmission and
the original 2.88 rear end. Very satisfying on street or highway, and
the Salisbury version of the LAT-34 Dana. Salisbury is owned by Dana,
and the Jaguar LSD mounts the original 2.88 ring gears.
Use the free Excel Transmission Calculator written by Bob Hokanson,
available at:
http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/HokansonGearSpeedXL/pt-HokansonGearSpeedXL.asp <http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/HokansonGearSpeedXL/pt-HokansonGearSpeedXL.asp>
Recommeded for anybody thinking of mucking around with transmission, rear end, or tire sizes.
Steve
___
Steve Laifman
Editor - TigersUnited.com
<http://tigersunited.com>
Russ and Tammy C. wrote:
<http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/HokansonGearSpeedXL/pt-HokansonGearSpeedXL.asp>
> I am going to run a ford motor sport 345 horse in my 65........would I still be happy with the close ratio transmission or should I change it to wide ratio? Street use only. Anybody have thoughts? Thanks, Russ
More information about the Tigers
mailing list