[Tigers] transmissions

Steve Laifman SLaifman at SoCal.rr.com
Sun Jan 27 13:28:10 MST 2008


Russ,

I agree with John Logan.  I have the "wide" (not) ratio transmission and 
the original 2.88 rear end. Very satisfying on street or highway, and 
the Salisbury version of the LAT-34 Dana.  Salisbury is owned by Dana, 
and the Jaguar LSD mounts the original 2.88 ring gears.

Use the free Excel Transmission Calculator written by Bob Hokanson, 
available at:

http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/HokansonGearSpeedXL/pt-HokansonGearSpeedXL.asp  <http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/HokansonGearSpeedXL/pt-HokansonGearSpeedXL.asp>

Recommeded for anybody thinking of mucking around with transmission, rear end, or tire sizes.

Steve


___
Steve Laifman
Editor - TigersUnited.com
 <http://tigersunited.com>



Russ and Tammy C. wrote: 
<http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/HokansonGearSpeedXL/pt-HokansonGearSpeedXL.asp> 

> I am going to run a ford motor sport 345 horse in my 65........would I still be happy with the close ratio transmission or should I change it to wide ratio?  Street use only.  Anybody have thoughts?  Thanks, Russ


More information about the Tigers mailing list