[Tigers] PCV summary
Ron Fraser
rfraser at bluefrog.com
Sun Oct 10 13:38:14 MDT 2021
Parts List 6601131 Mk I
6100538 C3DE-6A664-A Hose - PCV
6100669 97331-S Clips - Hose
6100215 C3TZ-6A666-A Valve assembly - this
is the early style PCV valve with threads
6100667 378754 Adaptor -
this is the brass part
6100668 378766-S Adaptor - this
is the rubber grommet in the valve cover
Parts List 6601334 Mk II
6100979 C3AZ-6A664-A Hose - PCV
6100669 97331-S Clips - Hose
6100825 C5AZ-6A666-A Valve assembly - this
is the later style PCV valve with hose fitting
6100667 378754 Adaptor -
this is the brass part - not correct for PCV valve with hose fitting
6100668 378766-S Adaptor - this
is the rubber grommet
There are some problems with these Ford part numbers.
C3DE-6A664-A is wrong - this hose is 3 5/64" long according to the Ford
Master Parts Catalog - this is a 1963 PCV system hose
C3AZ-6A664-A is wrong - this is bulk hose - bulk hose would be horrible for
this short distance
I don't know the correct Ford part numbers for either hose.
The PCV hose available today is C6AZ-6A664-N with 2 right angle bends.
This hose can be cut for the brass adaptor style hose.
See pcv hose picture from Ron Fraser
Brass adaptor was made by Weatherhead. See picture from Terry
Packer with Weatherhead Logo
Correct brass Adaptor and PCV valves - see picture from David Franchi - also
note that the PCV valve could have AC Spark Plug stamped on it
Derek Daily has stated the his early B19KC engine has the brass adaptor
part. This seems to support that all 260 engines had the brass Adaptor.
I have been told that some Mk II engines have the brass adaptor part. This
should only be possible if Ford stock piled this part for the Tiger engine
build and they changed to the later style PCV valve system only after using
up the brass adaptor parts. Since the Mk II Parts List is vague about this
and the Mk II Service Manual shows a cleaning procedure for the PCV valve.
I can see how anyone not an original owner could be confused and purchase
the brass adaptor thinking it was correct.
I'm guessing that some of this confusion with the Parts List is due to
Chrysler's involvement with the Rootes Group and the reassignment of
personnel to other programs. Well, great discussion, I think we all
learned something but I'm sure there are more questions too.
Thanks to all for their input.
Ron Fraser
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20211010/2b99fc6b/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Weatherhead.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 131470 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20211010/2b99fc6b/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pcv hose.png
Type: image/png
Size: 545063 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20211010/2b99fc6b/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DSCN9871.JPG
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3574254 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/tigers/attachments/20211010/2b99fc6b/attachment-0001.jpe>
More information about the Tigers
mailing list