From jay.laifman at gmail.com Sat May 3 07:18:10 2025 From: jay.laifman at gmail.com (Jay Laifman) Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 06:18:10 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Rotted Tiger Message-ID: I'm surprised how many people are saying positive things about this car. The amount of patches, rust holes showing light, wobbly metal, a new paint job to hide how really bad the body is, and the twisted shape of the body up front. Ugh. https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1964-sunbeam-tiger-26/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From winbladgary at gmail.com Sat May 3 08:33:24 2025 From: winbladgary at gmail.com (Gary Winblad) Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 07:33:24 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Rotted Tiger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Jay, I am one that has been saying good things. Its the first entry level project that i have seen on BAT in a long time. Yeah, its a non-runner. Yeah, its not a good candidate for a full show quality car. BUT, it looks (and its hard to really tell from a few photos I know) like it could be a runner pretty easily. It takes me back to Tigers we were buying in the '70s. It doesn't have the huge rust problem.. though the floors have been very abused. Panhard bar frame mount has been "fixed" poorly too. I don't see the twisted body up front.. it looks to me like just the bumpers (both) are toast. Its NR with 4 hours to go and bid is only $7600 but too, its in FL. Gary W. On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 6:22?AM Jay Laifman wrote: > I'm surprised how many people are saying positive things about this car. > The amount of patches, rust holes showing light, wobbly metal, a new paint > job to hide how really bad the body is, and the twisted shape of the body > up front. Ugh. > > https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1964-sunbeam-tiger-26/ > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/winbladgary at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jay.laifman at gmail.com Sat May 3 09:43:24 2025 From: jay.laifman at gmail.com (Jay Laifman) Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 08:43:24 -0700 Subject: [Tigers] Rotted Tiger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yeah, it's always a balance. I hate when people go on BAT and just trash a car. But then I figure every seller using the platform has to know that is the risk. I wonder if the potential sale prices make it worth it. There is a guy who sells Porsches on BAT. He has the greatest write ups and pictures - they all look in top condition. Yet, I also see those cars get relisted, and when they are, they show a fair amount of work that had to be done. It just goes to show you just how real buyer beware is on BAT. I'm still amazed how many people spend high dollars on cars on BAT without a real inspection. I think on this Tiger, someone may strip off the paint and find a disaster that is not remotely economical to repair. On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:33?AM Gary Winblad wrote: > Hi Jay, > I am one that has been saying good things. > Its the first entry level project that i have seen on BAT in a long time. > Yeah, its a non-runner. Yeah, its not a good candidate for a full show > quality car. > BUT, it looks (and its hard to really tell from a few photos I know) like > it could be a runner pretty easily. > It takes me back to Tigers we were buying in the '70s. > It doesn't have the huge rust problem.. though the floors have been very > abused. Panhard bar frame > mount has been "fixed" poorly too. > I don't see the twisted body up front.. it looks to me like just the > bumpers (both) are toast. > Its NR with 4 hours to go and bid is only $7600 but too, its in FL. > Gary W. > > > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 6:22?AM Jay Laifman wrote: > >> I'm surprised how many people are saying positive things about this car. >> The amount of patches, rust holes showing light, wobbly metal, a new paint >> job to hide how really bad the body is, and the twisted shape of the body >> up front. Ugh. >> >> https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1964-sunbeam-tiger-26/ >> _______________________________________________ >> >> tigers at autox.team.net >> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers >> http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/winbladgary at gmail.com >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cyclonegord66 at msn.com Sat May 3 12:17:47 2025 From: cyclonegord66 at msn.com (Gord Dewhurst) Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 18:17:47 +0000 Subject: [Tigers] Tigers Digest, Vol 18, Issue 72 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I see the same thing on BAT with the 55 - 57 Thunderbirds. People saying what a great car or how solid they are when the inner rockers and body supports are rusted out. ________________________________ From: Tigers on behalf of tigers-request at autox.team.net Sent: May 3, 2025 11:00 AM To: tigers at autox.team.net Subject: Tigers Digest, Vol 18, Issue 72 Send Tigers mailing list submissions to tigers at autox.team.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to tigers-request at autox.team.net You can reach the person managing the list at tigers-owner at autox.team.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Tigers digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Rotted Tiger (Jay Laifman) 2. Re: Rotted Tiger (Gary Winblad) 3. Re: Rotted Tiger (Jay Laifman) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 06:18:10 -0700 From: Jay Laifman To: "Tiger's Den" Subject: [Tigers] Rotted Tiger Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I'm surprised how many people are saying positive things about this car. The amount of patches, rust holes showing light, wobbly metal, a new paint job to hide how really bad the body is, and the twisted shape of the body up front. Ugh. https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1964-sunbeam-tiger-26/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 07:33:24 -0700 From: Gary Winblad To: Jay Laifman Cc: "Tiger's Den" Subject: Re: [Tigers] Rotted Tiger Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi Jay, I am one that has been saying good things. Its the first entry level project that i have seen on BAT in a long time. Yeah, its a non-runner. Yeah, its not a good candidate for a full show quality car. BUT, it looks (and its hard to really tell from a few photos I know) like it could be a runner pretty easily. It takes me back to Tigers we were buying in the '70s. It doesn't have the huge rust problem.. though the floors have been very abused. Panhard bar frame mount has been "fixed" poorly too. I don't see the twisted body up front.. it looks to me like just the bumpers (both) are toast. Its NR with 4 hours to go and bid is only $7600 but too, its in FL. Gary W. On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 6:22?AM Jay Laifman wrote: > I'm surprised how many people are saying positive things about this car. > The amount of patches, rust holes showing light, wobbly metal, a new paint > job to hide how really bad the body is, and the twisted shape of the body > up front. Ugh. > > https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1964-sunbeam-tiger-26/ > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers > http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: > http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/winbladgary at gmail.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 08:43:24 -0700 From: Jay Laifman To: Gary Winblad Cc: "Tiger's Den" Subject: Re: [Tigers] Rotted Tiger Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Yeah, it's always a balance. I hate when people go on BAT and just trash a car. But then I figure every seller using the platform has to know that is the risk. I wonder if the potential sale prices make it worth it. There is a guy who sells Porsches on BAT. He has the greatest write ups and pictures - they all look in top condition. Yet, I also see those cars get relisted, and when they are, they show a fair amount of work that had to be done. It just goes to show you just how real buyer beware is on BAT. I'm still amazed how many people spend high dollars on cars on BAT without a real inspection. I think on this Tiger, someone may strip off the paint and find a disaster that is not remotely economical to repair. On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:33?AM Gary Winblad wrote: > Hi Jay, > I am one that has been saying good things. > Its the first entry level project that i have seen on BAT in a long time. > Yeah, its a non-runner. Yeah, its not a good candidate for a full show > quality car. > BUT, it looks (and its hard to really tell from a few photos I know) like > it could be a runner pretty easily. > It takes me back to Tigers we were buying in the '70s. > It doesn't have the huge rust problem.. though the floors have been very > abused. Panhard bar frame > mount has been "fixed" poorly too. > I don't see the twisted body up front.. it looks to me like just the > bumpers (both) are toast. > Its NR with 4 hours to go and bid is only $7600 but too, its in FL. > Gary W. > > > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 6:22?AM Jay Laifman wrote: > >> I'm surprised how many people are saying positive things about this car. >> The amount of patches, rust holes showing light, wobbly metal, a new paint >> job to hide how really bad the body is, and the twisted shape of the body >> up front. Ugh. >> >> https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1964-sunbeam-tiger-26/ >> _______________________________________________ >> >> tigers at autox.team.net >> >> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html >> Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers >> http://autox.team.net/archive >> >> Unsubscribe: >> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/winbladgary at gmail.com >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ Tigers mailing list Tigers at autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive ------------------------------ End of Tigers Digest, Vol 18, Issue 72 ************************************** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Fri May 9 11:23:16 2025 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 13:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] PCV investigation Message-ID: <000901dbc107$0ec8bcd0$2c5a3670$@bluefrog.com> I?m reviewing the Tiger PCV system and the part numbers listed in the Parts List. These listed part numbers are for the 1963 Ford PCV system, they are not used on Tiger engines. C3DE-6A664-A is 3.08? long, made from C3AZ-6A664-A ? too short for the Tiger system C3TZ-6A666-A ? this valve is for the 1963 PCV system, it screws into C3DZ-6A665-A C3DZ-6A665-A is an adaptor assembly that bolts to that triangular pad at the rear of the intake manifold ? not a Tiger part The Tiger engines use the 1964 & 1965 Ford PCV systems. C3AZ-6A664-A is bulk ?? ID hose ? 25 foot length ? this is the service part for all PCV hose If anyone has original Tiger PCV parts; I?m interested in the part number on your PCV valve. I don?t think there is a part number on the hose but if you see one, I?m interested. Please include your engine # and group with any reply ? pictures welcome. Thank you for your help Ron Fraser -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rfraser at bluefrog.com Fri May 9 12:28:29 2025 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 14:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] PCV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <001b01dbc110$2b4d10f0$81e732d0$@bluefrog.com> Gary Thank you for the pictures. If you ever pull the PCV valve out, see if the C7OZ number is stamped into the valve body. C7OZ is a replacement number. Ron Fraser -----Original Message----- From: Gary Sent: Friday, May 09, 2025 2:24 PM To: Tiger List ; Ron Fraser Subject: PCV -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com From rfraser at bluefrog.com Mon May 19 08:21:02 2025 From: rfraser at bluefrog.com (Ron Fraser) Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 10:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Tiger PCV system investigation Message-ID: <000001dbc8c9$41de21e0$c59a65a0$@bluefrog.com> With help from Bob Mannel, here are some better Ford part numbers for the Tiger PCV system. Mk I 6100538 C3DE-6A664-A Ford lists this hose at 3.08" WRONG # - 1963 system C4AE-6A664-A 1964 System - Ford lists this hose at 5.75" C5OE-6A6853-A 1965 system - Bob Mannel indicated this hose (I'm not sure) C5xx-6A664-x 1965 system - (I expected a # like this) 6100669 97331-S Clip - Hose Corbin Clip 6100215 C3TZ-6A666-A PCV valve WRONG # - 1963 system C4ZE-6A666-A1 C4AZ-6A666-A2 Part number C5ZZ-6A666-A 6100667 378754 Adaptor - 1964 - system - Part by WEATHERHEAD 6100668 378766-S Rubber Grommet - valve cover Replacement Parts C4AE-6853-B Hose - cut to length 1964 system C7OZ-6A666-B Valve - 1964 system C6AZ-6A664-N Hose - 1965 system or cut to length for 1964 system C5AE-6A666-A Valve - 1965 system C7AE-6A666-B Valve - 1965 system C8SZ-6A892-A Grommet - valve cover Mk II 6100979 C3AZ-6A664-A Hose Listed as bulk hose 25 feet C5xx-6A664-x 1965 system - (I expected a # like this) 6100669 97331-S Clips - Hose Corbin Clip 6100825 C5AZ-6A666-A PCV valve 6100667 378754 Adaptor - not compatible with the above PCV valve 6100668 378766-S Rubber Grommet Replacement Parts C6AZ-6A664-N Hose C7AE-6A666-B Valve C8SZ-6A892-A Grommet - valve cover Bob Mannel's book, PDF Edition - Home of the Ford Small Block V8, indicates there are 4 possible PCV valves for the 1964 system. C3TE-6A666-B, C4AE-6A666-A, C4ZE-6A666-A1 and C4ZE-6A666-A2 and 3 for the 1965 system - C5AE-6A666-A, C5AE-6A666-B and C5AE-6A666-C All original Tiger PCV valves are serviceable; meaning they can be taken apart, cleaned then reinstalled. I still see some gaps in these part numbers that can only be filled in by Tiger Owners. If you have or think you have Original Tiger PCV system parts I would like to know those numbers. Please indicate your engine number and group with any reply. All additions and corrections welcome. Ron Fraser - rfraser at bluefrog.com -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jay.laifman at gmail.com Wed May 28 16:22:26 2025 From: jay.laifman at gmail.com (Jay Laifman) Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 18:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Tigers] Original Rivets? Message-ID: I wonder what the original rivets looked like. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IMG_3365.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 351260 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- From ktisdale at ix.netcom.com Wed May 28 16:41:08 2025 From: ktisdale at ix.netcom.com (Ken Tisdale) Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 16:41:08 -0600 Subject: [Tigers] Original Rivets? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ? On 5/28/2025 4:22 PM, Jay Laifman wrote: > I wonder what the original rivets looked like. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tigers at autox.team.net > > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html > Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive > > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/ktisdale at ix.netcom.com > > -- Ken Tisdale 303-807-5488 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ktisdale.vcf Type: text/vcard Size: 4 bytes Desc: not available URL: