Robert, were those replacements SUK couplings? I've been hearing bad
things about them. Apparently SUK couplings really SUK!
Russell
Robert L. Abernathy wrote:
>
> Richard, you are correct, they are rotoflex couplings but were
> made by Metalastik. I just replaced them on my Imp last year when
> the old ones (possibly original!) failed. They were labelled
> Metalastik rotoflex 45 Pat. no. 662337 21/332.
>
> I guess I won't be getting any new ones from them, if they've
> gone away.
>
> Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 09:36:56 CDT