and what does all this do to suspension components like cracking the 
     front member ?
     
     Stiffer front springs, wider wheels and stiffer shocks on the front of 
     Tigers causes the cross member to crack around upper suspension 
     mounts.  Also, lower fulcrum pins have broken on some cars.  Most of 
     the structural failures are blamed on stiffened suspensions,  added 
     weight of v8 and the wrong Ackerman steering angles on Tigers.  
     Alpines don't seem to have this problem, although yours has a v6 
     engine with more power and weight so there might be a concern there.
     
     
     Jeff
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Front Spindles for Series IV,V, and Tiger and Front springs
Author:  HERBEAM(at)aol.com at INTERNET
Date:    8/15/97 1:12 PM
Hey Gang,
     I came across a set of front spindles  at  Smitty's (but there are no
more) that came off a Minx/Rapier. They are identical to subj spindles except 
the axle is dropped 1". Sorta like those spindles you can buy to lower mini 
trucks !  Well, I installed them on a IV and found out that in addition to 
lowering the car it also added precious space for wheel clearance above the 
upper ball joint . It appears that with the added space there some deep 15"or 
16" rims could actually rotate over the ball joint. Old Rapiers and Minx's had 
15" rims and maybe thats why the spindles are the way they are. 
    Anyway, I'm looking for more and I'm sure there are others out there that
would love to get their hands on some. I will try to pick up some in England 
in Sept. The spindles were stamped w/: 1990445    17230(ls)  327(rs) & 
engcg56-s4js8.
     Springs:  I purchased a set of 335 tiger springs from the cat club for
my V6/Auto and the car sits lower now than with stock alpine springs.  The 
car suspension is firmer but not as firm as I'd like it.  Does anybody else 
make stronger springs ? 
     Rear  Springs:  Saw a pair of aftermarket rear springs for a jeep at the
off road warehouse that  were  36" eye to eye. The orignal springs on the car 
are about 42" eye to eye . What I would like to do to lower the car instead 
of using lowering blocks that increase susceptability to wheelhop is to 
relocate the front spring perch higher in the frame and more towards the 
rear. That would also help zero out the angle of inclination of the rear 
spring which adversely affects the handling. I was reading in the old tiger 
tips where one owner increased the length of the rear shackles to make the 
spring parralel with the ground and he said it improved rear end manners 
immensely.
Anybody out there experienced or like to comment of using shorter springs and 
moving perches to lower and improve the angle?
     
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 09:50:07 CDT