Jay Laifman wrote:
>
> Just a point of clarification. I said:
>
> "I don't mean to suggest that the factory necessarily knew what it was
> doing. But,
> if you want to assume that it knew what it was doing with the 4.22, the
> same logic would suggest that it also knew what it was doing when it went
> with the 3.89."
>
> First, obviously I was wrong about when the factory switched, including the
> fact that they switched back. Second, I actually meant to imply by the
> foregoing that I do not believe one can ever assume that the factory knew
> what it was doing, or that 30 years later we can ever be sure that bean
> counters, or supplier problems, etc., did not cause a change, or lack of
> change, as opposed to a technological reason. Having personal knowledge,
> such as Dick has, is a different story.
>
> Defensive mode off.
>
> Jay
Jeez Jay - you are starting to sound like a lawyer!
Tony
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 09:56:42 CDT