RE: 5-main better (was: Re: Hi, new UK lister)

From: Agent 86 (anthonyr(at)aqua.civag.unimelb.EDU.AU)
Date: Tue Jan 13 1998 - 17:44:34 CST


>I dont think that there is a big difference between the modulous of
>elasticity of Cast Iron compared to Steel, but since the steel 3 main
>is spun on three points instead of 5, identical forces will flex the
>shaft at least double the displacement.
>
>Jarrid Gross
>

Interestingly, perhaps, is the fact that the distortions are much greater
than this.

If with three bearings the distance b/n bearings is 2 units then with 5
bearings the distance will be 1 unit.

The rotating crank can be assumed a distributed load and the deflection is
proportional to length to the power 4 (2^4 = 16) so the 3 main crank
deflects 16 times as much.

The big ends could be considered a point load and deflection is
proportional to length cubed (2^3 = 8), 8 times as much.

Actually a three main bearing crank with all materials and cross sections
equal to a five main crank would deflect b/n 8 and 16 times as much. Other
considerations could make it even larger.

AJR



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 10:05:47 CDT