Don wrote and said he thought I had the hat logo to large in proportion the the hat, and looking at it now, I agree. I have downsized the (at) and the SUNBEAM some so it looks better. I left the disc with the new photos at home--sorry--but will try to post them to my site tomorrow (Wed).
Chuck wrote:
>Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 15:28:25 -0800
>From: CHUCK NICODEMUS <SEALMSTR(at)ICCOM.COM>
>Subject: HATS, HATS HATS.
>Now i have a delima. If I get two of one kind and someone else in the NW
>gets another, How do I tell that hat was the Alpine guy down the
>road..???
>Not to start a new thread,,but is every one going to get the same
>one((((JOKE) (8| )
>Well just a confusing thought. Tony, Dave, Rex and all the rest of the
>Northwesterners .
>Aa, eh?
>chuck
Chuck brings up an important point. While it is hard to get any group of humans to agree on any subject, it does make sense to try to have an "official" look to the hat so it can be readily identified in a crowd.
Someone else on the list wrote asking about the denim shirt--would the logo be smaller on the shirt than the hat? Yes it will. Very good observation. If there is interest in the shirt, I will do a sample and post it so you can see what the smaller logo would look like. Here again, the (at) and the SUNBEAM would be smaller with the address about the same (I hope it fits above the pocket's width!).
thanks
Lynn Sheeley Knoxville, Tn The List Hat Guy http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Track/6526