Re: ammeter: in series or parallel?

• Next message: LOsoccer(at)aol.com: "Stromberg Carbs"
• Previous message: Christopher Albers: "Re: The Unthinkable"
• In reply to: Ron Tebo: "Re: ammeter: in series or parallel?"
• Next in thread: Dobrowski, Robert S: "RE: ammeter: in series or parallel?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <36D16366.69A7905C(at)cadvision.com>,
Ron Tebo <tebomr(at)cadvision.com> wrote:
>
> You might infer that voltmeters are better because they are used in many
> more modern vehicles,but ammeters were replaced by a voltmeter (or an "idiot
> light") largely because most people had no idea what the reading meant. To

Yes, and the warnings of some well-meaning people that ammeters are
somehow bad news. ("I remember on my old XXX,....")

And, in general, it makes me nervous to see (non-essential) in-series
metering devices. It lets Mr. Heisenberg get closer to the works.

I'll just make leads to it off the harness that can be shorted if ever
necessary.

-- 
-              J e r o m e   Y u z y k | jerome(at)supernet.ab.ca          -
-           BRIDGE Scientific Services | www.tgx.com/bridge             -
-    Sunbeam Alpine Series II #9118636 | www.tgx.com/bridge/sunbeam     -
-    I'm going to SUNI III... Are You? | www.newsource.net/suni3        -

• Next message: LOsoccer(at)aol.com: "Stromberg Carbs"
• Previous message: Christopher Albers: "Re: The Unthinkable"
• In reply to: Ron Tebo: "Re: ammeter: in series or parallel?"
• Next in thread: Dobrowski, Robert S: "RE: ammeter: in series or parallel?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 10:36:03 CDT