I've seen this same attitude with every mark of British cars I've been
associated with. For some reason there are a number of people out there who
just can't accept that anything other than their one baby might have some
redeeming virtues. I may like one LBC over another but I find it very hard
not to appreciate them all.
> ----------
> From: herbeam[SMTP:herbeam(at)cari.net]
> Reply To: herbeam
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 1999 2:13 PM
> To: Jarrid Gross; 'Daniel J. Levitin'; alpines(at)autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: alpines(at)autox.team.net digest #1029 Thu Apr 29 04:05:01
> MDT1999
>
> There wouldn't be any Tigers if it weren't for Alpines and a lot less now
> without donor parts
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarrid Gross <JGross(at)econolite.com>
> To: 'Daniel J. Levitin' <levitin(at)ccrma.stanford.edu>;
> 'alpines(at)autox.team.net' <alpines(at)autox.team.net>
> Date: Friday, April 30, 1999 1:56 PM
> Subject: RE: alpines(at)autox.team.net digest #1029 Thu Apr 29 04:05:01
> MDT1999
>
>
> >Daniel J. Levitin, M.Sc., Ph.D. wrote,
> >
> >>Rootes Repairs in Redwood City is adamantly opposed to working on
> Alpines.
> >>It is very strictly "Tigers only."
> >
> >
> >Sounds just short of insulting.
> >Wonder if ever an alpine panel has entered his shop?
> >
> >Jarrid Gross
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 10:45:58 CDT