Hi tachman
I have numerous weird experiences with the rootes smiths tachometers also. A
goodie on one of my humber sceptres is that once the revcounter goes above
5000rpm, it then starts going backwards. Quite amusing. This really points
to electrical problems, such as Jarrid outlines. Even after having them
overhauled by an expert, these oddities still persist. The main one I'd
really like to overcome is variation in readings with ambient temperature.
On a hot day, the tach will read up to 20% high. Again, this is the same on
all my rootesmobiles and means my ear is really a safer judge of engine
critical point.
Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: Olson, Mark W <mark.w.olson(at)intel.com>
To: <tigers(at)autox.team.net>; <alpines(at)autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, 7 January 2000 09:26
Subject: Tach Lubrication
> Sunbeamers,
>
> Over the holidays, I worked on about a dozen Smiths tachometers, in
addition
> to the many tachs I've worked on prior to that. I have noticed that a lot
> of them were unable to register above 4 to 5 grand. I surmised that the
> movements were getting dirty and or worn, so I went to my local jeweler to
> tell him my problem and ask him how he lubricates watches. He suggested I
> try sewing machine oil. The good news is it didn't seem to make the
> movement worse, but it sure didn't improve it either. So I gave up on
that
> idea.
>
> I solve the problem literally using brute force. I lower the resistance
of
> the thermistor/resistor pair to provide more energy to the deflection
coil.
> While this works, I'd really rather have a way of effectively lubricating
> these old tachs. The original lubrication is 30 years old.
>
> So the question is, what do the various materials and/or mechanical
experts
> on the lists recommend I try to extend the life of these old beasts?
>
> I've already had one person suggest sperm oil, but I wouldn't even know
> where to find that, let alone want to risk bringing down the wrath of
whale
> lovers everywhere onto my head.
>
> Mark
>
> PS, this email is also a test to see if the "smut filters" at Intergraph
> will reject an email with the word "lubrication" in it. T.J, email me if
> you don't get this.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 08:47:08 CDT