Fwd: New engine

From: Pasanville(at)aol.com
Date: Mon Aug 07 2000 - 14:27:08 CDT


--part1_c.8feaafe.26c0678c_boundary

 

--part1_c.8feaafe.26c0678c_boundary
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-path: <Pasanville(at)aol.com>
From: Pasanville(at)aol.com
Full-name: Pasanville
Message-ID: <e1.826d700.26c0676c(at)aol.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:26:36 EDT
Subject: Re: New engine
To: rpalmer(at)ames.ucsd.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 120

Listers,
Being one who restores Mustangs (Vintage). I can say that the 289 and 302
have the same block. As a mater-of-fact the only difference was the 302 did
have a longer stroke 3.0 versus 2.870 inches. By the way the 260 had a 3.80
bore with a 2.870 stroke.
Pete Sanville
66 Alpine
B395004314

--part1_c.8feaafe.26c0678c_boundary--



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 09:07:53 CDT