rpms vs. mph

From: Scott Donnelly (oharajem(at)free.midcoast.com)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:11:18 CDT

Next message: chuck nicodemus: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Previous message: Hal436(at)aol.com: "Used Alpine parts"
Next in thread: chuck nicodemus: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Reply: chuck nicodemus: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Maybe reply: jeyerman(at)ix.netcom.com: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Maybe reply: AlpineDriver(at)aol.com: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Maybe reply: Thomas Wiencek: "RE: rpms vs. mph"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 50 mph I am turning about 5000 rpm. Does this sound about right or is
my tach off? If these cars were capable of nearly 100mph, alot must
happen within the next 1000 or so rpms!
Scott Donnelly
SV

Next message: chuck nicodemus: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Previous message: Hal436(at)aol.com: "Used Alpine parts"
Next in thread: chuck nicodemus: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Reply: chuck nicodemus: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Maybe reply: jeyerman(at)ix.netcom.com: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Maybe reply: AlpineDriver(at)aol.com: "Re: rpms vs. mph"
Maybe reply: Thomas Wiencek: "RE: rpms vs. mph"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 08:19:50 CDT