I saw a report that said the reason the salmon population had tanked was
because the fish was not getting to the sea for the salmon to feed on - so the
water is dumped into the sea vs used to water crops. I personally don't think
this argument holds - it takes more than these few cannels of water and the
related little fish to sustain the salmon population. Looks like a way to
'point' away from the issue/bad decision.
Phil Hall
NASA/MSFC/ED10
Systems Engineering
work : 256-544-2525
cell: 256-975-6385
-----Original Message-----
From: datsun-roadsters-bounces@autox.team.net
[mailto:datsun-roadsters-bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Eric Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:54 AM
To: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
Subject: [Roadsters] california water
I'm all for efficient sewage disposall, I am wondering why there is not more
opinion among Californians that farmers and crops are more important than a
two inch fish. I'm trying to understand what is going through the minds of
lawmakers. Again, the water is not conserved it's being sent to the sea.
Anyone?
You are subscribed as phillip.b.hall@nasa.gov
Datsun-roadsters mailing list
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/datsun-roadsters
________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Datsun-roadsters mailing list
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/datsun-roadsters
|