fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: soft mounts for SU's

To: "Friends of Triumph" <FOT@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: soft mounts for SU's
From: "jaboruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 22:09:01 -0400
Henry, I used HS6 carbs on a long manifold for a half season, and they
drove me nuts.  I could never get them to flow enough fuel.  I gave up
on them and bought Webers. Problem gone!  The H6 carbs that came with
the car always ran ok, but were too long for air cleaners, and often
leaked.  They also had supports to the tops of the float bowls.   I
never did try anything with soft spacers.  The engine would die out at
5900 rpms with out air cleaners and no muffler, but would make it to
6300 with air cleaners and muffler.  The carbs were also modified as
per David Vizard.  I figured that it worked with HS2's for my Spitfie,
so it would work for the HS6's - WRONG.  Jack Wheeler had chimmed in
way back when, that he had best results with stock HS6's.
  Joe(B)
----- Original Message -----
From: Henry Frye <thefryes@iconn.net>
To: <fot@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: soft mounts for SU's


> This is one problem I have not had, but I think I am about to...
>
> The TR4 racer has a set of H6's, the long carbs on the short
manifold. They
> are TR3 carbs. They have worked OK, but...   ;-)
>
> I just found a set of HS6's, the short carbs on the long branch
manifold. I
> plan to run them at the next outing.
>
> Just looking at the two setups, I can see where the HS6's on the
long
> manifold might have a greater tendency to shake, thus foaming the
gas in
> the fuel bowls.
>
> Does this phenomenon of foaming the gas in the fuel bowls only apply
to
> HS6's, or is a car running H6's also susceptible?
>
> Should I fabricate the soft mounts before VIR in 3 weeks?
>
> As always, thanks.
Only $9.95 per month!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>