fot
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [FOT] Trans Mount

To: BillB@bnj.com, vinttr4@geneseo.net
Subject: RE: [FOT] Trans Mount
From: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:35:57 -0400
Bill,

I've braced my Cannon manifold by running supports from the
inlet ends of the manifold down to the engine mount; I figure
there is a lot of weight hanging off the head on that side of the
motor so it needs all the help it can get; hopefully the broken
manifold problem may be diminished.

Also have balanced the motor and removed several pounds of
reciprocating mass.  Now when I crank the motor I can tell
when the bearings are going south; feels like nails on a blackboard?

Shane


----Original Message Follows----
From: "Bill Babcock" <BillB@bnj.com>
To: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>,<vinttr4@geneseo.net>
CC: <fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: [FOT] Trans Mount
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:31:09 -0700

Been there, done that, got the broken Weber manifold.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-fot@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-fot@autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of SHANE Ingate
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:27 PM
To: vinttr4@geneseo.net
Cc: fot@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [FOT] Trans Mount

Uncle Jack wrote:

 >This system lets the engine vibrate but not move radically.

Real men solid mount their motors (but still use rubber at the trans
mount).

Shane Ingate, filling-less in Maryland    ;)





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>