fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] Roller life

To: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] Roller life
From: Jim Cun <jimcun2001@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 02:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Jack,
        I thought as much it would need to be a roller lifter to make it work. 
Did a little bit of research here in OZ and seems it would be quite costly. Had 
a rough cost of $4500 AUS dollars and lot of trouble. The cam would be 1500 the 
balance taken up in the design by an engineer. 
 
Jim


----- Original Message ----
From: Jack W. Drews <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
To: Jim Cun <jimcun2001@yahoo.com.au>; Friends of Triumph <fot@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, 8 May, 2007 4:40:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Fot] Roller life


Looking at the profile of a roller cam, it looks like a flat lifter 
will not work on a roller cam. The shape of the lobe is quite 
different. The lobe shape on a roller cam is shaped kind of like a 
figure "8" or mild hourglass, so if you use a flat lifter on it, the 
lifter edges will dig into the flanks of the cam.

At 05:20 PM 5/7/2007, Jim Cun wrote:
>G'day guys,
>           Wanted to find out opinions on using solid lifters and a 
> roller cam?
>
>Jim
>
>Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________________
>vinttr4@geneseo.net
>Fot mailing list
>Fot@autox.team.net
>http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot



------------------------------------------------
No Virus Found In This Message
Scanned at barracuda.geneseo.net

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>