fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] TR-4 EGT ?

To: John Hasty <jhhasty@gdhs.com>,Rich Rock <rikrock@live.com>
Subject: Re: [Fot] TR-4 EGT ?
From: Tony Drews <tony@tonydrews.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:15:59 -0500
Cc: "fot@autox.team.net" <fot@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: fot-archive@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
References: <COL401-EAS4004739A7B588A98817347C6840@phx.gbl> <F0727827-445B-4636-B571-215110D9FE4F@gdhs.com> {sentby:smtp auth 173.22.113.197 authed with tony@tonydrews.com}
I use 1 and 4 but don't have a solid reason why that would be better 
or worse than 2 & 3.  4's the one that usually has problems if one of 
the cylinders is going to have a problem, I suppose.

Tony

At 05:46 PM 10/4/2012, John Hasty wrote:
>We use 2&3
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Oct 4, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Rich Rock <rikrock@live.com> wrote:
>
> > Amici,
> >
> > Getting ready to install a two-probe EGT gauge in a TR4.  The easy way is
>to
> > put probes in header tubes one and four.  Any reason not to use those
> > cylinders?  Like, do two and three typically run a little leaner, maybe?
> >
> > Intake system  is H6 SU's on a long-branch (TR4A) intake.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Rich Rock
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: 
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/fot-archive@autox.team.net



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>