fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] TR-4 EGT ?

To: <jhhasty@gdhs.com>, <rikrock@live.com>
Subject: Re: [Fot] TR-4 EGT ?
From: Kas Kastner <kaskas@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 03:35:12 +0000
Cc: fot <fot@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: fot-archive@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
References: <COL401-EAS4004739A7B588A98817347C6840@phx.gbl>, <F0727827-445B-4636-B571-215110D9FE4F@gdhs.com> FILETIME=[6D694D10:01CDA2AA]
were it me I'd use numbers 1 and 3.  Three is the problem area.

Never be beaten by equipment
 > From: jhhasty@gdhs.com
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:46:51 -0400
> To: rikrock@live.com
> CC: fot@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Fot] TR-4 EGT ?
>
> We use 2&3
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 4, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Rich Rock <rikrock@live.com> wrote:
>
> > Amici,
> >
> > Getting ready to install a two-probe EGT gauge in a TR4.  The easy way is
> to
> > put probes in header tubes one and four.  Any reason not to use those
> > cylinders?  Like, do two and three typically run a little leaner, maybe?
> >
> > Intake system  is H6 SU's on a long-branch (TR4A) intake.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Rich Rock
> > _______________________________________________
> > fot@autox.team.net
> >
> > http://www.fot-racing.com
> >
> > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> > Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/jhhasty@gdhs.com
> _______________________________________________
> fot@autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/kaskas@cox.net
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: 
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/fot-archive@autox.team.net



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>