fot
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fot] Fw: Ross Pistons?

To: "'Friends of Triumph' Triumph" <fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: [Fot] Fw: Ross Pistons?
From: jason@multivintage.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 22:04:12 +0000
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: fot@autox.team.net
Sensitivity: Normal
Whoops, Sorry, premature launch of response. I cannot comment on Ross, but for 
the GT6, Our many year loyalty lies with Venolia. Fresh ugrades still on the 
shelf for the next oversized upgrade.
Jason Ostrowski
Friendly Ghost Racing
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: jason@multivintage.com
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 21:51:11 
To: Scott Janzen<sjanzen@me.com>; <fot-bounces@autox.team.net>; 'Friends of 
Triumph' Triumph<fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] Ross Pistons?

You all know by now that I typically vote for what is best by track proven 
authority .  
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Janzen <sjanzen@me.com>
To: 'Friends of Triumph' Triumph<fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: [Fot] Ross Pistons?

I am building up a second (primary?) engine for the GT6.  I have a set of
barely used Ross pistons that currently have a gapless top ring, a traditional
second ring and an oil ring (third). I will be installing new rings and honing
the block.
The pistons weigh about 40 grams less than the Venolia pistons I have
historically used with no troubles.  Seems like the lighter weight should be a
plus, unless they are more prone to breakage . . .
I'm looking for feedback, positive or negative, with Ross pistons.  I'm not
looking to throw money at new pistons, but hate to build up a motor and skimp
somewhere that will cost me down the road.

Anybody?
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
fot@autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>