Will return runs be made at the end of the day or at dawn the next day?
Ed
Beverly C. Stanley wrote:
>
> John - you will have exactly the same distance both ways - you will have a two
> mile approach - three timed miles and a two mile shut down - with your average
> being taken of the same "relative" mile, rather than the same "physical" mile
>-
> If Larry's explanation is accurate - it was my understanding that with nine
>miles
> available we would be using the same "physical" mile - we will be discussing
>this
> extensivley, I'm sure, at the next SCTA / BNI meeting (this Friday night) and
>I
> will give you the latest from the "officials".
> Bev
>
> John Beckett wrote:
>
> > Wes
> >
> > So now I'm really cornfused. OK, basicly we don't have nine miles to run
> > on, right. So if we use the five mile, for best speed, on the down run we
> > can use the three mile on the return if we come back from the seven mile?
> >
> > John Beckett
> >
> >
> > At 07:58 AM 7/21/99 -0600, Wester S. Potter wrote:
> > >Larry Volk, Save the Salt chairman just gave me the latest on record return
> > >runs for Bonneville events this year. There is a modification on return
>runs
> > >for records. With the course the way it is, we will use the "relative"
> > >return mile, that is not the FIA same mile rule. If you set your fastest
> > >speed in the fifth mile from the start you will be able to take the speed
>in
> > >the fifth mile from the north end when you make your return run. This
>gives
> > >you the same length of track to get up to speed. Under the FIA rule you
> > >might have to take the speed in a mile nearer the start of the return run.
> > >There is not a full nine miles of course available the way the salt is now
> > >and as a safety consideration the USFRA and BNI representatives decided on
> > >this solution. Thought you might llike to know. Wes Potter, secretary
> > >USFRA
> > >
|