To all that might be interested...
It's been over 24 hrs... Not a word although 178 previous
e-mails on the subject not counting the ones i wrote.... Not
even a public show of hands from people here that are in
support, against and or think this needs to be addressed..
message received.. I have my own theories as to why it is so
quiet on this subject, but in general for peace and harmony
and good will to all i think the wise thing to do is just
keep them to myself. everybody have a good day, stand tall
if you can and if you can't, avoid mirrors as they never
lie.
Dave Dahlgren (where it is 8:00 am EST)
Dave Dahlgren wrote:
>
> It has been said that there is a rules meeting in Jan. What
> do I have to do to bring up a rules change for the
> Wankel(aka rotary) engine size factor for serious
> discussion? It has been e-mailed to death all over this
> group and to many individuals with all sorts of information
> to support it. can this be done via e-mail? if so to whom? i
> honestly think that waiting another year is a complete
> dis-service to the members of the LSR community that are
> interested or might consider building a car that uses on of
> these cheap and readily available power plants.
>
> So how is it done?
> Can it be done?
> Can it be done by phone or fax or e-mail?
> Is there any interest in changing this rule?
> Is there any information lacking that has not been passed
> around on the net?
> Does anyone that makes the rules have any questions at all
> or is there any info that I have left out in all the
> e-mails?
> Out of the people that have been included in this e-mail is
> anyone that helps make these decisions been left out?
> If so how are they contacted?
>
> I am hoping for a free exchange of ideas on this subject
> with some honest thought involved that is based on facts not
> history and personal feelings. I personally find it very
> hard to believe that FIA and SCCA is all screwed up in their
> use of engine factors of 2.1......... They have very good
> engineers that work on these subjects on a regular basis and
> represent both national and inter-national competition.
>
> If the answers to the above questions are no there is no
> interest and there is no desire to change anything or even
> consider any change for the benefit of the LSR community or
> to align SCTA with the rest of the world, please do me a
> small favor, actually two small favors.
> First is let that feeling be known publicly on the net at
> this e-mail group accompanied with the reasons why it can
> not or will not be changed along with the facts that made
> this decision the correct one.
>
> The other favor is small but personal, please leave off any
> personal attacks. I am not up to another tirade of being
> called a "Hot Shot wanna-be engineer" or sending out a bunch
> of crap! I do at times find great humor in it though when i
> watch Speedvision and ESPN and cars that I have supplied
> parts, done design work or personally tuned are very busy
> winning.....
>
> Dave Dahlgren
|