land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Air density and rolling resistance.

To: rtmack <RTMACK@pop3.concentric.net>
Subject: Re: Air density and rolling resistance.
From: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 06:29:18 -0400
Thinking about it some more, the moisture in the salt that is.... I am wondering
if the chemical composition is fairly constant in the area we race on or if it
might vary from year to tear. If it does i would think it would make a
electrical based measurement such as resistance a little futile as the
conductivity of the base material might change. I was looking at it another way
too. If we assume that what the salt is made of and water added to it, don't you
have a pretty good electrolyte? I mean with two dissimilar metals couldn't you
make a battery and measure the voltage? Or the pH ??? I will ask one of my local
scientist buddies that might have some experience with these measurements how
they might do it on the cheap. I am not looking for absolute readings just
relative ones that can be repeated year to year or day to day.

Dave Dahlgren ( who still believes it all comes down to where the rubber meets
the road.)

rtmack wrote:
> 
> Dave:
> I can't tell from my mail whether my last note reached you-- about using 
>either neutron
> backscatter or electrical resistance to measure salt moisture.  Since then I 
>realized that
> the "dielectric test" you referred to is probably similar to another 
>technology that was
> being used in the 80's to find moisture in roofs. It was advertised as a 
>"capacitance
> device". (Like the neutron backscatter device), it looked like an upright 
>vacuum cleaner.
> I never talked with anyone who could explain the technical workings, but I 
>know that the
> response was proportional to the amount of water present.  I assumed that the 
>device
> produced an electrical potential, and in someway "read" the residual charge 
>that it
> produced in the subject. (These fell out of favor-- can't remember why-- 
>before I found
> out much about them.  I have no idea whether they are still available.  
>Priced a bit less
> than the neutron backscatter device, if I remember correctly.)
> 
> What about spatial variation in moisture on the salt?  If we knew how the 
>moisture varies
> from place-to-place on the course, could we take advantage of it? This could 
>be explored
> very easily (need an airplane, pilot, and $400/day equipment rental fee)-- by 
>overflying
> the salt after a hot day, and mapping the heat variation with a thermal 
>imager.  Wetter
> salt has a higher heat capacity, and will show-up after sundown as "hotter" 
>spots in the
> thermal images, since it holds the sun's heat longer than the drier salt.
> 
> Incidently, the agricultural moisture meters mentioned by "Kvach" seem to be a
> manifestation of the electrical conductivity meter (ohmmeter) that a couple 
>of us have
> suggested.  It would sure be handy to have one already configured for 
>measuring moisture.
> I have been trying to find such a thing without success (probably because I 
>know almost
> nothing about agriculture).  Can someone tell me where to get one?  (I made 
>one out of a
> cheap ohmmeter, but have not been very satisfied with it.)
> Russ Mack
> 
> Dave Dahlgren wrote:
> 
> > I would think there ought to be a way to measure moisture content
> > electronically. Similar to a dielectric test i would think.  How do they do 
>it
> > with wood i don't think they weight them and burn them do they?? Plus i 
>don't
> > want to do an excavating job to get the measurement or take hours to do it.
> > I would use it to compare to either wheel slip or accelerometer readings. 
>See if
> > there is a correlation to it all. or to see if it really changes very much 
>at
> > all during the day. If it does not change then the experiment proved that
> > whatever it is that changes the times in the am for many cars is not the 
>salt.
> > personally I think there s a lot to it but it will remain to be seen.
> > I know I have heard a lot about good and bad salt conditions, i would just 
>like
> > to quantify them and relate those conditions to the performance of a car or
> > motorcycle. What may be good for one type car may be bad for another.
> >
> > Dave Dahlgren

///
///  land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe land-speed
///
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>