I will bet they all had 28.34 inch tall tire or at least a loaded tire radius
that is equal to that.. About an 89 inch roll out. Sorry Doug it is all in the
numbers. Think what you will it really doesn't matter.. Ususally when people
think something is a bunch of horse crap it only means they don't understand
it... I will make a deal with you, you delete my messages and I will delete
yours, fair trade?
Dave
DOUG ODOM wrote:
> O.K. I have stayed out of the power loss debates so far. The last
> couple of months I have been helping tech for a road race group called
> N.A.S.A. They run a class called A.S.C. American Stock Car. Now the
> rules make you run a sealed ZZ4 crate motor. The motors have been
> dynoing at 361 to 366 HP at the crank. This weekend we ran them on a
> Dynojet chassis dyno. I will give you a sample of what we found below.
> The main thing that I found interesting was this, Some cars had Ford 9",
> some with Quick changes. Some had Jerico's some with T-10's. All had the
> same spec tire and about the same rear gear ratio. So what was so
> interesting? This--- They ALL lost the same amount of power!!!
> Highest power 308.0 Lowest 302.2
> Highest torque 362.3 Lowest 361.7
> The car with the 308 power ran in the back and the lowest power car
> won by 4 sec.
> I think most of this power train loss figuring and charting is just a
> case of mental masturbation.
> Doug Odom in big ditch
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
|