land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Four-Valve Pentroof Chamber

To: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
Subject: Re: Four-Valve Pentroof Chamber
From: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:15:15 -0500
Yes 300 M is the material of choice.. i don't think there is anything from a
chrysler that will go to those rpms short of their turbine car experiments..
Lots of steps to make one though goes to the heat treat shop at least 3 times
unless you are unfortunate enough to work harden it while cutting then there are
more trips..
Dave

"Albaugh, Neil" wrote:
> 
> Dave & List;
> 
> Just to clarify what you said, "...a 300 M crankshaft...", I'm reasonably
> sure you meant a crank made of 300 maraging steel alloy-- not one from a
> Chrysler 300M...in case there was any confusion on that point. 250M & 300M
> alloys are very tough stuff that also has a very simple heat treatment
> process.
> 
> Regards, Neil     Tucson, AZ
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Dahlgren [mailto:ddahlgren@snet.net]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:37 AM
> To: Elon Ormsby
> Cc: land-speed@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Four-Valve Pentroof Chamber
> 
> The secret to thatsituation comes stock in most high performance
> motorcycles.
> Short sroke and light parts with exceptional material selection.. In a car
> size
> engine a 300 M crankshaft and Ti rods.. I have run Carillos witha 2.8 stroke
> just shy of 11k in a cosworth YB. the pistons didn't like it one bit
> though..
> Got about 11 or 12 passes out of it and that was it.
> Dave
> Elon Ormsby wrote:
> >
> > Dave Dalhgren said. . . (Snip) "lightweight valve gear that will go to 14k
> > rpm without pneumatic valve gear. With it 18k rpm is on the horizon"..
> >
> > Dave, how do you keep these motor together!!   What kind of rods? Titanium
> > or other?  -  Elon

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
///  what is needed.  It isn't that difficult, folks.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>