land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: belts and stuff

To: "tom sarda" <sardatech@yahoo.com>, <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: belts and stuff
From: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:04:33 -0800
om
Go by the SCTA rule book for the installation on the liner. Make sure they
are SCTA approved (SFI) etc. Save yourself
a lot of work or rework on the salt.Make sure you fit everything with the
fire suit on.
Glen
----- Original Message -----
From: "tom sarda" <sardatech@yahoo.com>
To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:41 PM
Subject: belts and stuff


> Hey List,
>  I have recently installed Williams seat belt five
> point harness in the Craftsman trucks we race and
> NASCAR said be sure we install them as the
> manufacturer specifies. That is the lap belt is to be
> across the lap and straight down not at a 45 degree
> angle to the lap like we normally install the Simpson
> or Howe belts. If I use these belts in the 'liner,
> Williams, that is, do I install them like the SCTA
> rule book says or like the manufacturer says. The
> Williams belts are a bit less expensive. I'm curious.
>   I will be putting the front end suspension on the
> liner very soon. It's a Mustang two design. Should I
> use the cast spindles or should I look for steel ones?
>  Appreciate your opinions.
>  Leaving for Darlington tomorrow then turn around in a
> week and head for Mesa Marin in Bakersfield. Busy time
> right now. Look for me on catch can on 66 truck or 57
> truck or next week on 66 or 77 trucks. We run several
> and don't know for sure which week what truck we will
> run. Crew chiefs. Sheeesh! can't live with them, can't
> live with them.
>  Later.
>  Tom
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
///  what is needed.  It isn't that difficult, folks.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>