--- Changes are mentioned verbally or through email. This
--- year I received only three proposed changes that are correctly
presented.
--- Bottom line? Do your homework, present the factors that will make us
believe
--- that you deal will benefit mankind far into the future.
Dan,
I'm curious about the status of the rule chage for MPS-G. I have presented a
good case both verbally and on the list as to why I think the current rule
no longer makes sense. I do not believe the "intent" of the rule was to
prevent bikes from competing in MPS because the OEM fender extends beyond
the rear tire by 1/2". The interpretation of the rule is probably incorrect
since it refers to streamlining and the fender certainly does not make the
vehicle more aerodynamic.
I have not submitted anything in writing to the committee yet since the rule
change was supposedly being considered and Henry told me I'd be wasting my
time. I could submit my reasoning if it would help build a case but it is
now past 10/01/XX. What is the format for proposing a formal change? Who
gets to vote?
MPS-G has been talked about for the two years that I've been involved with
the sport and hopefully it will be voted on and resolved once and for all.
Either way, I will be back next year (in compliance) to claim what is
rightfully mine. ;=)
Jim
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>
Reply-To: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>
To: "land speed" <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Subject: new classes
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 06:23:09 -0700
_________________________________________________________________
Get MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service FREE for one month. Limited time offer--
sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
|