land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Dry sump systems...

To: "'Askotto@aol.com'" <Askotto@aol.com>, "'Keith Turk'"
Subject: RE: Dry sump systems...
From: "Freiburger, David" <David.Freiburger@primedia.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:38:49 -0500
"Wanted" a wet sump is strong language. It's just what was there. We can
make it live, but we've proven twice that Bonneville wants a dry sump.
Sometimes Maxton/Texas, too. Ask me what 261 mph and 20 psi looks like.

DF

> ----------
> From:         Keith Turk
> Reply To:     Keith Turk
> Sent:         Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:35 PM
> To:   Askotto@aol.com
> Cc:   land-speed@autox.team.net
> Subject:      Re: Dry sump systems...
> 
> Yeah I suspect it's some better with a sealed engine.... but I used the 
> system to pre-oil the motor with the Rodeck block...  then I found I
> really 
> liked the whole drysump gig... it takes the oil out of the pan and keeps
> it 
> away from the crank... not a bad thing.... then of course you have no oil 
> return problems because your sucking it out of several different places...
> 
> I've had or seen most of the things that can or do go wrong with wet sump 
> systems... and had some issues last year that we are addressing on
> Saturday 
> with a new Milodon pan... ( at 600 bucks  retail ...they ain't cheap 
> either )   Keep in mind Freiburger is the Engine guru on the Camaro and
> he's 
> the one that wanted the wet sump....  Quite frankly no matter how much I 
> like dry sumps.... I have to admit that once you get them sorted out wet 
> sumps can work okay....
> 
> K 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>