mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Smogging the B -Reply

To: mgs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Smogging the B -Reply
From: Kenneth Scott <KSCOTT@holycross.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:48:11 -0500
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to 
consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to 
properly handle MIME multipart messages.

--=_326036DB.D8B9D1B2
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline

The basic frustration is with the attitude "I don't care whether it makes
emissions specs or not, it ain't stock so it don't pass".  This is blatant
stupidity.  If certain emission limits are set and my car passes these it
should not matter what is under the hood.  This is called being
reasonable and logical.  We are dealing with government here and
government is not known for being reasonable or logical. 
Just my $0.02
Kenneth A. Scott       KScott@HolyCross.edu
Academic Support Specialist
The College of the Holy Cross
Worcester, MA 01610
--=_326036DB.D8B9D1B2
Content-Type: message/rfc822

Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.8.3/) 
with SMTP id HAA04311; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 07:39:41 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.8.3/) id HAA04238 for 
mgs-outgoing; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 07:39:23 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <333AADA4.413@erols.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01KIT (Win16; U)
Sender: owner-mgs@autox.team.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Nolan Penney <npenney@erols.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 12:25:56 -0500
From: Nolan Penney  <npenney@erols.com>
To: damitdick@juno.com
Cc: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Smogging the B
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline

>My '80 MGB-LE has not turned a wheel in nearly two years simply because 
>I cannot get it passed the "It's not visually Stock" attitude. I wanted 
>to use the "CA Legal" weber set up with an extractor exhaust! This setup
>was/is legal through '74. I was even willing to use a cat converter in
>the exhaust down stream of the Header but NOT ONLY NO, BUT HELL NO! So
>the car sits!

Well DUHH!!!  Your car is an 80, that's six years after 74 standards.  
Cripes, by that logic I shouldn't have to have headlights on the TF since 
they weren't required back in the 20's.  

Come on, crying because you can't pass visual for some other era car is a 
seriously childish ploy.  One the inspectors really aren't going to have 
any sympathy for.  Nor would most other people for that matter.

>And if you think that's bad. What do you think is going to happen when 
>my newly acquired Factory Clone of a MGB-GT V8 crosses the state line?

Since you seem to be the type that likes to beat your head against walls, 
you'll have a hell of a time and never get the car on the road.  I, on 
the other hand, would drop the stock four in their, let it pass, and then 
swap it back.



--=_326036DB.D8B9D1B2--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>