mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tires - what's the verdict on 195/70s

To: Rick Jennings <ahhclem@kcnet.com>
Subject: Re: Tires - what's the verdict on 195/70s
From: Bob De Weese <bearlock@erols.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 12:14:34 -0500
Rick Jennings wrote:
> 
> At 08:37 PM 1/19/98 UT, doug russell wrote:
> >List,
> >
> >What a dilemma! I need new tires for the 76 B and my brother-in-law just
> >dropped off 4 brand spanking new 195/r70 14 tires in my lap (Firestone
> FR410).
> > I've heard talk of going as big as 185/70s - are 195/70s over the edge??
> >
> >My 77B had 195/70 14's courtesy of the PO. I ran them for 40,000+
> including some autox. IMHO they're to tall for a chassis already to high.
> They did give a softer
> ride than the 185/60 14's currently on the 77 but the taller sidewalls
> contribute
> to body roll and understeer. Anyway in retrospect they felt inprecise compared
> to the 185/60 Contienentals. As I recall the 60 series are around an inch
> shorter.


You are correct.  Actually when I set them all next to each other (not 
mounted) the 60s where about an inch and a half shorter.  I went with 
taller tires for two reasons.  1)  the difference in size would throw 
off the speedometer (right?) and  2)  with some of the rough streets 
around here, I need all the ground clearance I can get.  I'm sure that 
the 60s would corner a little better (but exhaust systems aren't cheap). 
 


Bobby
-- 
                                       Bob De Weese  
                             Certified Professional Locksmith
                                   bearlock@bigfoot.com


*******************************************************************
*  "The secret to effective communication is knowing what to say, * 
*   how to say it, and whom to say it to."                        *
*******************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>