mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LE

To: WSpohn4@aol.com
Subject: Re: LE
From: miker15@juno.com
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 20:53:21 EDT
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998 13:33:55 EDT WSpohn4@aol.com writes:
><<I recently acquired a very rusty Canadian LE
>that one of the previous owners has removed the plaque from.  How
>does a person determine what number this car should be?  The serial
>number is GHN5UL492754 .  Maybe those on the list with Canadian LE's
>could email me with their serial number and LE number to help me
>narrow the search down.  At this stage, from previous cars owned,
>all I can tell is that it is later than #51. >>
>
>Sounds like a good subject for landfill, myself, Len, but then to each 
>his own
>(I assume you don't intend to keep the car?).
>I don't think there is any rule, ie they didn't put the tags on in 
>numerical
>order, and the chance of you meeting up with the same number car is 
>pretty
>small. If you call Octagon in Vancouver, they think that they may have 
>wrecked
>one and kept the glove box with tag - that way at least you would know 
>you
>weren't duplicating another one.
>
>What other more sensible projects are you working on these days?  ;-)
>
>
>Bill S.
>
Ah, a little vim and vitriol from mr Spohn - Glad to see you back Bill,
we were all getting far too complacent!!  Heck i think somebody actually
complimented sonebody else the other day on an ongoing project. . . . 
what will we all come to??

mike robson
69 roadster
70 BGT
72 roadster
tongue firmly in cheek!


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LE, WSpohn4
    • Re: LE, miker15 <=