mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: And they said it was the new MGB!

To: <Transmancat@aol.com>, <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: And they said it was the new MGB!
From: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:33:52 +0100
I only heard about the fire problem after I had mine, when there was a
question about their safety in Parliament because Princess Anne drove one.
The response was "The Scimitar is no more likley to catch fire than any
other car."  What a lie that was.  I contacted the factory who told me mine
had not had the recall mod.  Took it to a Scimitar dealer to have it done.
When I got it back I couldn't see any difference - but at that time I didn't
know what the fix was (a pin to fix the brass petrol inlet pipe into the
alloy carb casting).  Some time later I was working on the car and had the
pipe come out in my hand - what a close one that was.  But then, I had a
couple of narrow squeaks with that car and could write a book on the
problems ...

----- Original Message -----
From: <Transmancat@aol.com>
To: <mgs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 5:03 AM
Subject: And they said it was the new MGB!


> Hi David et al
> The CVH engined cars were always harsh. The pushrod unit that they
initially
> used from the Fiesta was much better but boy was it gutless!
> My Scimitars all had cooling problems too. But I knew about it and the fix
is
> easy really. I was more concerned about the fire problem after I lost one
> that way in the New Forest at 3.30am one morning. I also bought one that
had
> been a total loss for an under bonnet fire.
> A few parts bins were raided to supply the parts for the Scimitar range.
The
> TR front end was great for cheap parts compared to how much Reliant wanted
> for them.
> I still like them.
>
> Dave Hill, When were you with PC. I did some freelance work for Classic
Car
> (TACC over here) a few years ago.
>
> Regards,
> John J, Black
> http://www.waterloo-dtr.com
> Agents for  Vicarage  Jaguar
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>