mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fwd: OD]boundary="------------54299D639E69BFCE4261F03B"

To: "frank krajewski" <frankk@intap.net>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: OD]boundary="------------54299D639E69BFCE4261F03B"
From: "British Sportscar Center" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:58:46 -0700
Frank......

A common misconception is that the late MGB shift knobs are removed by
undoing the chrome nut that is below the shift knob. Actually, inside the
knob, there is another nut that goes around the shaft and down into the well
of the knob. This is what you have to undo to get the knob off. It requires
either a special factory tool  (!) or a combination of needle-nose pliers,
screwdriver or hammer and punch, depending how tightly it is installed.

Lawrie
British Sportscar Center

----- Original Message -----
From: frank krajewski <frankk@intap.net>
To: British Sportscar Center <Lawrie@britcars.com>
Cc: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: OD]boundary="------------54299D639E69BFCE4261F03B"


> Lawrie: I think the tranny oil question has been somewhat resolved now how
the
> hell do I get the shift knob off? Have soaked it for days with no apparent
> impact. There are two flats on either side of the chrome retainer just
below the
> know but all I have done thus far is dechrome it! I have r&r motors all my
life
> and never run into a shift knob removal problem. It's a 79 with the od
wiring
> harness in the center.
> Frank
>
> British Sportscar Center wrote:
>
> > Frank,
> >
> > I don't know who started the campaign to use non-detergent oil. As
someone
> > said earlier, there are no combustion by-products in a gearbox so there
is
> > no need to use a detergent oil. However, I am not aware of any damaging
> > effects from the detergent additives so I see no reason to specify a
> > non-detergent oil for a gearbox, with or without overdrive. I use
Valvoline
> > Racing 30 wt., for its anti-foaming qualities and high shear strength
and,
> > quite honestly, I have no idea if it is a dergent or non-detergent
> > oil..................!
> >
> > Lawrie
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: frank krajewski <frankk@intap.net>
> > To: British Sportscar Center <Lawrie@britcars.com>
> > Cc: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 12:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Fwd: OD]boundary="------------54299D639E69BFCE4261F03B"
> >
> > > Lawrie: Thanks again. Who started the campaign to use the 30
> > wt.non-detergent?
> > > It makes sense and I have done it for years although some on the
question
> > its
> > > use since it is not specified in the shop manuals.
> > > Frank
> > >
> > > British Sportscar Center wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have it on reliable authority that, in the early 70's, BL issued a
> > > > Technical Bulletin to their dealers which stated that it was OK to
use
> > 90wt.
> > > > rear axle oil in gearboxes (no distinction made between o/d or
non-o/d).
> > > > About ten months later, another Technical Bulletin was issued which,
in
> > more
> > > > urgent terms, stated that the use of 90 wt. rear axle oil in
gearboxes
> > was
> > > > no longer recommended.
> > > >
> > > > Bentley probably missed the second of those two bulletins.........
> > > >
> > > > Lawrie
> > > > British Sportscar Center
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: frank krajewski <frankk@intap.net>
> > > > Cc: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 8:26 AM
> > > > Subject: [Fwd: OD]boundary="------------54299D639E69BFCE4261F03B"
> > > >
> > > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > > > > --------------54299D639E69BFCE4261F03B
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------54299D639E69BFCE4261F03B
> > > > > Content-Disposition: inline
> > > > >
> > > > > X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
> > > > > Message-ID: <39996102.4B32F26A@intap.net>
> > > > > Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:25:54 -0400
> > > > > From: frank krajewski <frankk@intap.net>
> > > > > Reply-To: frankk@intap.net
> > > > > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U)
> > > > > X-Accept-Language: en
> > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > > > To: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: OD
> > > > > References: <39989B65.2671E388@intap.net>
> > > > <011601c006bc$43ff5880$3d64a8c0@gouldfo.com>
<399956E2.4204E3F5@ktc.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Charley: The Bentley Manual says to use the same oil in the engine
or
> > > > > tranny or to use 90 wt. I have been told by those more
knowledgable to
> > use
> > > > > 30 wt. non-detergent. See Lawrie's posting. Bill Bassett, noted
Jaguar
> > > > > restoration shop owner and my neighbbor, highly recommends 30 wt.
> > > > > non-detergent and his shop uses it in all the vintage Jags they
> > restore. I
> > > > > am concerned that the Bentley manual also recommends 90 wt!
> > > > > Frank
> > > > >
> > > > > Charley & Peggy Robinson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Paul,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   I never did see a reasonable explanation of why one should use
> > > > > > non-detergent oil in the L de N, MGB overdrive.  The driver's
> > handbook
> > > > > > in my Bentley manual makes no such distinction.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   CR
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --------------54299D639E69BFCE4261F03B--
> > > > >
> > >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>