mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: brake woes

To: <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: brake woes
From: "T. Keith Vezina" <tkvezina@home.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:54:47 -0500
The frustrating thing is that I replaced both rotors when I did a brake job
just 10K miles ago.  If the right outside pad had not lost it's friction
material, I should have been able to get another 30-40K miles on these pads
and would not have scarred the rotor.  I did re-pack the bearings while I
had it off and I will do the other side tomorrow.

BTW, does anyone make pads for B's with wear indicators on them?  If my old
ones would have had them, I think I would have caught the problem before it
damaged the rotor.

Also, what's the consensus out there, organic or semi-metallic?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesse Robinson" <jesserobinson2@hotmail.com>
To: <mgs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: brake woes


> Keith,
>
> You have to buy new rotors.  I read the same thing in my manual, and I
tried
> to get mine ground.  My Trak Auto said it was too small too, but the guy
> tried anyway.  It really screwed up the rotor!  It starts to wobble on the
> machine and they could not get a clean cut.  Unless you know someone with
a
> machine your @*&! outta luck.  Anyway I hear the new rotors are made with
a
> different material that works better with the pads.  Trust me, I know your
> fustration but new pads and rotors are the way to go.  It looks so pretty
> too.  How are your calipers?  And while your at it, when it the last time
> you repacked your wheel bearings....
>
> Good Luck,
> Jesse
> 1970 MGB
>
>
> >From: "T. Keith Vezina" <tkvezina@home.com>
> >Reply-To: "T. Keith Vezina" <tkvezina@home.com>
> >To: <mgs@autox.team.net>
> >Subject: brake woes
> >Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 20:38:46 -0500
> >
> >It seems that I lost the friction material off of one of my front brake
> >pads
> >and it scarred the rotor.  I took the rotor to AutoZone to be turned, but
> >they refused to because "their computer" said the min. thickness should
be
> >0.341".  I returned with my shop manual to show the manager that the
> >thickness of a new rotor is 0.34" and minimum is 0.30".  He said that is
> >obviously an error in the computer, but still would not turn them because
> >of
> >the liability!  (Of course, a new rotor from them is "unavailable".)
> >
> >If it wasn't for lawyers, we wouldn't need lawyers!!
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>