mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Leather versus Vinyl

To: "Barrie Robinson" <barrier@bconnex.net>,
Subject: Re: Leather versus Vinyl
From: <paul.hunt1@virgin.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 16:04:34 -0000
Yeah, but the Egyptians didn't have vinyl.

----- Original Message -----
From: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>
To: Tim Economu <economu@whidbey.com>; <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>
Cc: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Leather versus Vinyl


> Folks at world,
>
> I am humming & hahring about vinyl or leather for my interior; Satur or
> Prestige (not Moss as Prestige is better quality materials and price BUT
> not original pattern!).  The one thing that is making me lean towards
> leather is that they only found two things in the Egyptian tombs that had
> not rotted -  corn and leather treated with bees wax!
>
>
> At 10:19 AM 3/7/01 -0800, Tim Economu wrote:
> >On digest so this may be a little late....
> >
> >Dan:
> >
> >I put in Moss black leather last year, thanks to help from Lawrie, as a
> >replacement to my 31 year old black leather, and I highly recommend it.
They
> >breathe better than plastic, wear much longer, and they feel very soft
and
> >nice on the skin, if you happen to be wearing shorts or short sleeve
shirt.
> >
> >If you plan on keeping the car, the extra cost will be amortized over the
> >time of ownership, and may actually be less cost in the long run.
> >
> >
> >
> >Kind regards,
> >
> >Tim Economu
> >'69 MGBGT mona, red with black leather (and improper red piping)
>
>
>
> Regards
> Barrie Robinson
> barrier@bconnex.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>