mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MkI, MkII...

To: "Skye Poier" <skye@ffwd.cx>, "MG Nuts" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: MkI, MkII...
From: "British Sportscar Center" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:20:21 -0800
Correct as far as you go, Skye. Unfortunately, MG also used MkI, II, etc,
for Midgets, Magnettes and  MGAs had a MkII (as did TDs).

'Twould have been nice if Joe had given even a brief description of the MG
he was talking about. (Wind-up windows, side curtains, engine number, etc.)

Lawrie
BSC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Skye Poier" <skye@ffwd.cx>
To: "MG Nuts" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: MkI, MkII...


> Word on the street is that Joe said:
> > Hi,
> > Please excuse my ignorance But I am new in this.
> > Can anyone explain the difference between the MG MkI and MkII Years of
> > production Are they MGA types or MGB types.
>
> http://www.mgbexperience.com/reference/evolution.html
>
> Bascially, the Mk I MGB was 63-67 chrome bumper with metal dash,
> started with 3-main then 5-main engine, no synchro on first, positive
> ground.  Mk II 68-69 had negative earth, all synchro, negative ground
> with alternator, and in the USA the "pillow" dash.
>
> The "Mk" system is kinda useless in describing MGB's because they
> don't line up very well with the major changes to the car.
>
> Skye
> 66 B

///
///  mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>