All he was implying was that MGs were designed around a grab bag of
Morris/BMC/BL corporate parts, which is more or less true over their entire
history, not that they were literally "kit" cars in the "some assembly
required" sense of early Loti or Fiberfab Jamaicans.
--
Max Heim
'66 MGB GHN3L76149
If you're near Mountain View, CA,
it's the primer red one with chrome wires
on 7/10/08 3:49 PM, Murray Arundell at arundell@ghs.com.au wrote:
> MGs could never be termed a "Kit" car. For a start you could never order
> them as a kit and assemble them at home. So am surprised at your
> description.
>
> Murray Arundell
> Brisbane Australia
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mgs-bounces+arundell=ghs.com.au@autox.team.net
> [mailto:mgs-bounces+arundell=ghs.com.au@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of David
> Breneman
> Sent: Thursday, 10 July 2008 11:53 PM
> To: mgs@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Mgs] MG 1100 questions
>
> A friend of mine had an 1100 in high school. It was a great car.
> Since all MGs are essentially kit cars, parts availability isn't
> a problem, at least for mechanical components. Trim pieces are
> a little harder to find.
> You are subscribed as arundell@ghs.com.au
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Mgs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/mgs
http://www.team.net/archive
|