--WebTV-Mail-1405530879-79
--WebTV-Mail-1405530879-79
Content-Disposition: Inline
X-WebTV-Signature: 1
ETAtAhRUSqbJ9kqQSNQTMIC6C5J2E0WGzQIVAJK2JTzltSQ1DQsYeqUNL2LrKpha
From: SALAGUI@webtv.net (SALVADOR AGUILERA)
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 07:01:31 -0800 (PST)
To: miq@teleport.com
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] new possible clunker law in OR
Message-ID: <22495-36F509CB-166@mailtod-152.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
In-Reply-To: miq@teleport.com's message of Sat, 20 Mar 1999 14:02:55 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: Inline
MIME-Version: 1.0 (WebTV)
--WebTV-Mail-991252436-92
They can take my ole Chevy when they take my cold dead foot off the
accelerator! Why does this sound so familiar?? Count me in..
--WebTV-Mail-991252436-92
Content-Disposition: Inline
Received: from mailsorter-101-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.98) by
postoffice-152.iap.bryant.webtv.net; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 14:12:55
-0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <oletrucks-owner@autox.team.net>
Received: from triumph.cs.utah.edu (triumph.cs.utah.edu [155.99.188.52]) by
mailsorter-101-2.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.graham.14Aug97)
with ESMTP id OAA28433; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 14:12:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id
PAA20769 for oletrucks-actors; Sat, 20 Mar 1999 15:03:00 -0700 (MST)
From: miq@teleport.com
Message-Id: <199903202202.OAA29378@user1.teleport.com>
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] new possible clunker law in OR
To: oletrucks@autox.team.net
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 14:02:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1cbd3356.36f3ab2d@aol.com> from
"MarkNoakes@aol.com" at Mar 20, 1999 09:05:33 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL0b2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-oletrucks@autox.team.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: miq@teleport.com
MarkNoakes@aol.com says:
>
> This is definitely a serious change in the approach to "clunker" laws and
> definitely something we can't ignore--either from the legal side or from the
> technical "how much emissions our trucks put out" side. Notice that this is
> much more insidious than the TX law that someone else put on the list
> recently. Even though this new approach is starting in Oregon, expect it to
> spread to other states.
I've been giving this some thought, and came up with an idea. Please allow
me some indulgence here. While I gladly administer the list and keep it
running for purely selfless reasons, I'd like to think that having a part
in organized 540 members world wide interested in these oletrucks entitles
me to a perk from time to time. This is one of those times.
I'd like to put up a draft letter to the list--others input is welcome, and
then submit it to the legislation involved with this signed by all the
members of the list (well their email addresses anyway). What I would do
is send the list the letter to be sent with a disclaimer on it reading:
"Your silent acceptance of this letter forwards the list
administrator the right to add your email to the signers as a class
agreement. If you do not wish to be a party to this stance, send
a message to (miq@teleport.com) and I will remove your address from
the list of signers when the letter is sent to the legislature."
Obviously, the letter drafted and the list of signers would be available
for other states fight in this issue.
So I'd like to hear opinions on this. Am I stepping over the line here?
--
__
Miq Millman miq@teleport.com
Tualatin, OR
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
--WebTV-Mail-991252436-92--
--WebTV-Mail-1405530879-79--
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|