oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oletrucks] Brake and Trans linkage problem

To: <ChevTruk53@aol.com>, <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] Brake and Trans linkage problem
From: "joe" <chevy1@jps.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 19:48:24 -0700
Hope about lengthening the shifter arm out of the column by 2 or 3 inches so
the shifter linkage will be back in the same location?

Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: ChevTruk53@aol.com <ChevTruk53@aol.com>
To: oletrucks@autox.team.net <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Date: Monday, April 30, 2001 6:24 PM
Subject: [oletrucks] Brake and Trans linkage problem


>Sorry I didn't clarify that the column shift which had to be moved
"outside"
>(toward the drivers door) by 2 or 3 inches to clear the headers) ... and
that
>this MIGHT have complicated the "interference" of the travel-arc of the
>brake-booster arm when applying the brakes...  Hopes this helps with your
>answers
>
>
>Zach
>Return-Path: <redsfast@bellsouth.net>
>Received: from  rly-xb03.mx.aol.com (rly-xb03.mail.aol.com
>  [172.20.105.104]) by air-xb03.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP;
>  Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:38:15 2000
>Received: from  mail5.atl.bellsouth.net (mail5.atl.bellsouth.net
>  [207.203.120.24]) by rly-xb03.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.36) with ESMTP; Mon,
>  30 Apr 2001 13:37:51 -0400
>Received: from redsfast (adsl-20-177-112.asm.bellsouth.net
>  [66.20.177.112]) by mail5.atl.bellsouth.net (3.3.5alt/0.75.2) with
>  SMTP id NAA28156 for <chevtruk53@aol.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:40:42
>  -0400 (EDT)
>Message-ID: <001501c0d19c$3ee9ffc0$70b11442@redsfast>
>From: "Lyle Castens" <redsfast@bellsouth.net>
>To: "Castens, Zach" <chevtruk53@aol.com>
>References: <001701c0d127$c7cb67e0$721a77d8@joegarcia>
>Subject: Re: [oletrucks] Brake and Trans linkage problem
>Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:37:33 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
>X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.97c
>X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
>
>Never mind me trying to type something that I don't know about... you go
ahead
>and answer...  just make sure to clarify that the column shift had to be
moved
>"outside" (toward the drivers door) by 2 or 3 inches to clear the
headers)...
>and that this MIGHT have complicated the "interference" of the travel-arc
of
>the brake-booster arm when applying the brakes...
>
>(((  NOT that we would change things - we had no choice because of the
headers
>- but thinking about it now, if the column COULD have stayed "original"
>location, I'd bet that we wouldn't have had the interference problem... but
>since we wanted the headers and the column, this is just another wrinkle to
>iron out...  )))
>
>Might also mention something about the "mis_aligned" brake pedal  (firewall
>penetration to the booster arm)...  which is necessary for clearance
between
>the booster-arm's travel-arc and the engine...
>
>The other guy that responded (with the pics of the bucket seats) needs to
>understand that it's COLUMN shift - not floor shift...
>
>As far as solving the mis_alignment between the pedal and the booster-arm,
we
>should be able to drill a new hole like we did for the column, and move the
>pedal to PROPERLY fit the booster-arm (patching the firewall hole later
with
>all the other ones)...  But the obvious and most important trick - right
now -
>is the column-tranny shift linkage...  I don't think that the 1 inch
(maybe)
>that we'd move the pedal, would really solve that much - maybe even make
more
>- interference...
>
>And, speaking of firewall holes... need to think of some kind of bushing or
>grommet to keep the brake pedal from "wobbling" around the hole and rubbing
>metal-to-metal against the firewall...  and thinking back to the
accelerator
>cable, from the pedal to the carb, even though the cable is "inside another
>cable", having the sharp edges of the hole rub the outer cable jacket will
cut
>and damage that cable, if nothing else than the vibration when the engine
is
>running and the body is "bouncing" from bumpy roads, unless we have a
grommet
>there, also...
>
>Sounds like we might have to have to take another look at different shift
>linkage options... either the "cable" thing for Fords... or a SPECIALIZED
>catalog from Lokar or Kugel...  (I'll check out the internet this afternoon
>for Lokar and Kugel... or do you have those specialty catalogs already)
>oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>