spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Vented vs non-vented oil caps.

To: "Spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Vented vs non-vented oil caps.
From: "Robert Duquette" <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 18:20:08 -0400
Reply-to: "Robert Duquette" <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
I had thought that my 1098 had a non-vented cap, but recently I discovered
that it is ( now that I took the lint out of the holes ) a vented cap.

So ... is this a good thing for me or not?

( I do have a spring in my PCV now ... WOO-HOO!  However, I haven't verified
in any manner that it is proper, ... only that it was found in a used PCV. )

Robert Duquette
Ottawa ON Canada
http://www3.sympatico.ca/robertduquette
RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca
'65 RHD BRG Sprite
Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gronberg John <john.gronberg@us.landisstaefa.com>
To: 'Majordomo, Spridgets List' <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Date: July 9, 1999 12:39 PM
Subject: Vented vs non-vented oil caps.


>The 1098 engine uses a "closed" (non breathable) oil cap. The early 1275
>uses a "open" oil cap. When I look at the two designs for PVC control they
>look identical. I get considerable less oil escaping when I use the closed
>oil cap on the 1275. Any comments?
>
>Regards
>John Gronberg
>Siemens Building Technologies, Inc.
>Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089-4513
>Phone:  847-215-1050 ex 5092
>Fax:      847-229-3658
>Email:  john.gronberg@us.landisstaefa.com
>
>
>




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>