spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Gulp Valve

To: Larry Miller <millerls@ado13.com>
Subject: Re: Gulp Valve
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 12:14:31 -0500
Cc: Bkitterer@aol.com, spridgets@autox.team.net
References: <e4.61e6697.2675dd2e@aol.com> <000701bfd478$ea917af0$d4695098@larry>
Not to many people are seen these days driving a car that is 26 years old. What
is communist Kalifornia's definition of "old"?

Larry Miller wrote:

> Hi Bob
>
> A '74 is not considered an old car. I was talking about the visual that is
> part of the smog check process. Just passing the tests is not good enough.
> All original parts must be present.
>
> I sure hope they do not reinstate the roadside checks. I got a ticket one
> time for dodging one of them.
>
> Larry
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Bkitterer@aol.com>
> To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2000 11:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Gulp Valve
>
> >
> > In a message dated 6/11/00 9:55:30 PM, millerls@ado13.com writes:
> >
> > << In CA you can't pass the visual inspection without it. >>
> >
> > All of our cars that are past the magic age have never been looked at,
> that
> > is there is no visual inspection except perhaps when you sell the car.
> You
> > are correct that the law for the old cars states that they must pass
> visual
> > inspection but as far as we know there are no inspection called for.
> There
> > is a lot of debate and discussion going on in Sacramento about road side
> > inspections and mobile units to check emissions of vehicles going down the
> > highway.  Being stopped for one of these, if they come into existence, are
> > the only occasions for inspection that come to mind.  Do you know of other
> > occasions?
> >
> > Bob and Annice
> > 1960 Sprite (Mk IV indiguise)
> > 1967 Sprite Mk III (in progress)
> >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>