spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: bugeye alternators

To: spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: bugeye alternators
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 09:10:17 -0500
References: <B56CDE69406ED211844700A02461EDDE03AF7F67@a09devlab.diebold .com>
An alternator is a better solution. However, Trish wrote that a prime 
motivator is money. I believe she is an undergrad on a very limited 
budget. Cleaning lenses and connectors is about as inexpensive as you 
can get.

Another alternative, and clearly one that only works if the charging 
system is up for it, is to run all the time on high beam. My driving 
environment is full of aggressively stupid people; I run high beams 
day and night. In 5 years only twice have I been dipped.

J

At 8:37 AM -0500 2/7/02, Kansa, Robert wrote:
>i have to somewhat disagree.
>while i admit a perfectly running generator setup can work well.
>thers a deffinite reason that modern cars use altenators.
>for the "originality" boys yes i agree, it will do the job. and if your
>trying to stay original, by all means have at it.
>but ive replaced every lucas charging device ive ever owned.
>and replaced it with an better/lighter/less complex/attractive/neatly
>installed/higher charging/more reliable/cheaper...altenator.
>they are more efficient and generally can do a better job.
>but thats my opinion.
>
>ginetta..suzuki charged
>bugeye..mazda charged
>big healey..gm charged


_____________________________________________________________
Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD
Assistant Professor, Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
Senior Editor, Molecular Vision, http://www.molvis.org/molvis
mailto:jboatri@emory.edu

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>