Thanks Annice,
Worth noting that the same data that we use to convict the guilty is every
bit as powerful in releasing the innocent. In one case three Great Danes
were on 'death row' at the pound for an attack of a small boy who wasn't
sure which of the three backyard escapees had attacked him. Our testing
proved two of them innocent and pinpointed the guilty. Even though the
three were from the same litter, the DNA testing is powerful enough to
differentiate between them. The innocent two are back home.
Glen
> In this case, not a bit fishy. Glen is a very reputable researcher into
dna
> for the University of California. Also, you will note, that his post
> indicates that he is not out to prove anything--merely to establish a base
> for charting indications. And that's as it should be. If I had a pit
bull,
> I would trust him with its dna. The truth might help those who sincerely
> believe that the dogs have received a bad rap. And if the dogs indeed are
> biologically more likely to bite, then they should be kept away from
> children, as well as adults who don't want to cohabitate with a dangerous
> animal.
>
> Annice & Bob
> 1960 Bugeye (Mk. IV in disguise) "The Sprite"
> 1966 Sprite Mk. III (Still in Boxes) "Trevor"
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/spridgets
|