spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cam choice

To: Spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Cam choice
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:08:04 -0800
References: <1c6.15b80952.2d6f012f@aol.com> <CDF27237-6872-11D8-8EF9-000A95E94A4C@valentinephoto.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
My engine uses an Elgin 003 (268) cam. Engine is for street use - 1380cc 
- single HIF6 SU (1.75 inch) - Long 3-1 header - compression at 9.4:1. I 
only have about 180 miles on engine so have not seen how it pulls to 
redline - I try to keep rpms below 3000 (I really, really try - but not 
always easy!). Good low end torque - have accidently "chirped" in 2nd & 
3rd gears (Datsun 5-speed). Will see about 4th & 5th after engine is 
properly broken in.<bg>.  Nice sound, and slightly "lumpy" idle - so you 
know something  good is under the hood (oops - I mean bonnet).

The engine builder Bill Gilcrease at Mincomp Racing Services in Costa 
Mesa, CA helped design the cam profile. Bill runs the same cam in his 
street Mini (1275 A-series), and swears by it for both 1275s & 1380s 
(street use - not racing). No personal experience with Kent, but have 
heard good things.

Good luck,
Jim Rogers
San Juan Capistrano, CA

Kevin Valentine wrote:

> Bob and list,
>
> I'd be interested in the replies you get on this.....
>
> I'm leaning towards the Kent MD266 (engine - 1275cc - 30 over with 
> Weber 45dcoe and LCB header) My compression is at about 9:1....
>
> I'm also interested in any input on the Elgin Cams.
>
> Recommended suppliers?????
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin V.
>
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2004, at 2:58 AM, BCAH@aol.com wrote:
>
>> Any real world comments on which Kent cam gives good low end torque? 
>> Bob C in
>> KS 






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>