spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 4 x 100m spridget spacer/adapter

To: Chris King <cbking@alum.rpi.edu>
Subject: Re: 4 x 100m spridget spacer/adapter
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 00:53:00 -0400
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
References: <1649f01c4345b$aa621740$0a02010a@mail2world.com> from [151.201.225.217] at Fri, 7 May 2004 23:53:01 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Some of the early Omni/Horizon and Shelby versions used the 4x100 
pattern also. The Aluminum Shelby rims were 15x6 with a 40mm offset. 
Just for fun, I held one of mine up to the Bugeye and the 205/50 x 15 
tires are about the same diameter (23.1") as the tires on the car! Might 
be a bit wide, but looked cool as hell. The early 4x100 ones can be had 
in the $20 each range. Early Neons also came with 4x100 pattern. Just 
wanted to toss a few more options into the mix. Didn't measure the 
center hub diameter.

Dave & Bobbie

Chris King wrote:

>Yes, that's the idea. That's why I went with the Miata wheels, as the
>+45 mm offset (compared to the stock spridget 25mm [1"]) gave me room
>for the lug nuts for attachment of the spacer/adapter. I've also made
>the spacer with a hub-centric protrusion of 54mm for the hub-centric
>Miata wheels. Other FWD wheels (Honda, VW) have larger hub centers, and
>probably would work OK. There was a big debate in the Miata.net archives
>about wether the Miata wheels are "truly" hub-centric, although some
>Miata drivers report using other wheels without vibration problems.
>
>BMW E30 wheels have only a +30mm offset, so I didn't have room for this
>kind of spacer. They'd work OK if you just re-drilled your
>hubs/axles/drums, and best with a 5mm spacer (and even then, the 14 x
>6.5 "basketweave" wheel would be a tight fit.).
>
>-=Chris






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>