Definitely over priced and ugly (the Sky is better looking). But I
said nothing about OWNING one. I said I could take it for a ride ;-)
Larry
On Oct 16, 2006, at 15:24 PM, type79@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> $37,000? For one butt ugly car?
>
> As much as I am not and never have been interested in Corvettes, I
> would take a Vette first. First after a Lotus Elise, that is. Or if
> we're talking practicality, a Boxster.
>
> The Solstice has one of the ugliest front ends of any car created.
>
> jay fishbein
> wallingford, ct
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Larry B. Macy, Ph.D." <macy@bbl.med.upenn.edu>
>> Sent: Oct 16, 2006 2:09 PM
>> To: Spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net>
>> Subject: Just for fun
>>
>> Now, this I could take for a ride ;-)
>>
>> http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/corvette-powered-solstice/
>>
>> For the tinyurl fans:
>> http://tinyurl.com/y3aqss
>
--
Larry B. Macy, Ph.D.
macy@bbl.med.upenn.edu
System Manager/Administrator
Neuropsychiatry Section
Department of Psychiatry
University of Pennsylvania
3400 Spruce St. - 10 Gates
Philadelphia, PA 19104
"I finally figured out what email is for. It's for communicating with
people you's rather not talk to." G. Carlin
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
|