The Skye IS better looking. Strange they would choose to market that car
through a division known for boring cars sought by people who have no
passion towards them.
I would love to take one for a drive too. As a matter of fact, I would
love to take your car for a drive. Nothing like driving a car you don't own!
jay fishbein
wallingford, ct
http://home.ix.netcom.com/~type79/
"If you're going to say anything filthy, please speak clearly." Vivian
Stanshall
Larry B. Macy, Ph.D. wrote:
> Definitely over priced and ugly (the Sky is better looking). But I
> said nothing about OWNING one. I said I could take it for a ride ;-)
>
> Larry
>
> On Oct 16, 2006, at 15:24 PM, type79@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
>> $37,000? For one butt ugly car?
>>
>> As much as I am not and never have been interested in Corvettes, I
>> would take a Vette first. First after a Lotus Elise, that is. Or if
>> we're talking practicality, a Boxster.
>>
>> The Solstice has one of the ugliest front ends of any car created.
>>
>> jay fishbein
>> wallingford, ct
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>>> From: "Larry B. Macy, Ph.D." <macy@bbl.med.upenn.edu>
>>> Sent: Oct 16, 2006 2:09 PM
>>> To: Spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net>
>>> Subject: Just for fun
>>>
>>> Now, this I could take for a ride ;-)
>>>
>>> http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/corvette-powered-solstice/
>>>
>>> For the tinyurl fans:
>>> http://tinyurl.com/y3aqss
|