tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Roller Rockers

To: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@peoplepc.com>, "Tigers"
Subject: Re: Roller Rockers
From: "Ken Mattice" <cat347@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 11:13:05 -0800
Likewise the Crower Stainless Roller Rockers are a little smaller than any
of the Alum pieces...I haven't found that you need the baffles at all...
Ken Mattice
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@peoplepc.com>
To: "Tigers" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: Roller Rockers


> There are lots of differences in roller rockers including overall
> dimensions.  As an alternative to the hurky big aluminum-bodied rollers
> check out Comp Cams Pro Magnum Roller Rockers.  They have a much smaller
> profile which makes them easier to fit under aluminum valve covers.  I've
> been using a set for several years.  I do recommend going to the 7/16 stud
> size as a guard against breaking rocker studs with high pressure valve
> springs and high lift camshafts.
>
http://www.competitioncams.com/information/Products/RockerArms/ProMagnum.asp
>
> Bob Hokanson
> Retired as of 1/1/02
> Looking forward to spending more time with my toys

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>